African animal trypanocide resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorKeneth Iceland, Kasozi
dc.contributor.authorEwan, Thomas MacLeod
dc.contributor.authorSusan, Christina Welburn
dc.description.abstractBackground: African animal trypanocide resistance (AATr) continues to undermine global efforts to eliminate the transmission of African trypanosomiasis in endemic communities. The continued lack of new trypanocides has precipitated drug misuse and overuse, thus contributing to the development of the AATr phenotype. In this study, we investigated the threat associated with AATr by using the major globally available chemotherapeutical agents. Methods: A total of seven electronic databases were screened for an article on trypanocide resistance in AATr by using keywords on preclinical and clinical trials with the number of animals with treatment relapse, days taken to relapse, and resistant gene markers using the PRISMA checklist. Data were cleaned using the SR deduplicator and covidence and analyzed using Cochrane RevMan®. Dichotomous outputs were presented using risk ratio (RR), while continuous data were presented using the standardized mean difference (SMD) at a 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of eight publications in which diminazene aceturate (DA), isometamidium chloride (ISM), and homidium chloride/bromide (HB) were identified as the major trypanocides were used. In all preclinical studies, the development of resistance was in the order of HB > ISM > DA. DA vs. ISM (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI: −0.54, 0.83; I2 = 46%, P = 0.05), DA vs. HB (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.45; I2 = 0%, P = 0.86), and HB vs. ISM (SMD = −0.41, 95% CI: −0.96, 0.14; I2 = 5%, P = 0.38) showed multiple cross-resistance. Clinical studies also showed evidence of multi-drug resistance on DA and ISM (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.71–1.43; I2 = 46%, P = 0.16). To address resistance, most preclinical studies increased the dosage and the treatment time, and this failed to improve the patient’s prognosis. Major markers of resistance explored include TbAT1, P1/P2 transporters, folate transporters, such as F-I, F-II, F-III, and polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors. In addition, immunosuppressed hosts favor the development of AATr. Conclusion: AATr is a threat that requires a shift in the current disease control strategies in most developing nations due to inter-species transmission. Multi- drug cross-resistance against the only accessible trypanocides is a major publichealth risk, justifying the need to revise the policy in developing countries to promote control of African trypanosomiasisen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKabale Universityen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.subjectAfrican animal trypanosomiasisen_US
dc.subjectTrypanosoma brucei bruceien_US
dc.subjectTrypanocide resistanceen_US
dc.subjectDrug resistanceen_US
dc.subjectT. evansien_US
dc.subjectT. congolenseen_US
dc.subjectT. vivaxen_US
dc.subjectBovine trypanosomiasisen_US
dc.titleAfrican animal trypanocide resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US


Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
2.27 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format
African animal trypanocide resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
1.71 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission