Comparison of Deep Learning Techniques in Detection of Sickle Cell Disease.
dc.contributor.author | Mabirizi, Vicent | |
dc.contributor.author | Kawuma, Simon | |
dc.contributor.author | Kyarisiima, Addah | |
dc.contributor.author | Bamutura, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Atwiine, Barnabas | |
dc.contributor.author | Nanjebe, Deborah | |
dc.contributor.author | Oyesigye, Adolf Mukama | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-27T14:29:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-27T14:29:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description.abstract | Recently, the transfer learning technique has proved to be powerful in enhancing the development of deep learning methods for sickle cell disease (SCD) detection as a complement to the clinical method where a hemoglobin electrophoresis machine is used. This is evidenced by some models and algorithms with ≥90% prediction accuracy. From the literature, most of the proposed methods are trained and tested on pre-trained deep learning models like VGG16, VGG19, ResNet, Inception_V3, and ReNet. However, training and testing of these methods are limited to one model and separate datasets which may lead to biased results due to implementation in a variation of these models which affects the results produced. To this end, there exists a need to evaluate the SCD models using the same dataset. Thus, in this research study, we carried out a comparative investigation and evaluated predominate pre-trained models used to detect SCD using the same dataset to ascertain which one has the best accuracy. We used a secondary dataset obtained from an online dataset. In our study, we have discovered that Inception V3 yielded the highest accuracy of 97.3% followed by VGG19 at 97.0%, VGG16 at 91%, ResNet50 at 82% and ReNet at 67%, and the CNN-scratch model achieved 81% accuracy. Results from our study will aid researchers and industry practitioners in making decisions on the best deep-learning model to use while detecting SCD. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mabirizi, V. et al. (2023). Comparison of Deep Learning Techniques in Detection of Sickle Cell Disease. Kabale: Kabale University. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12493/2001 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Kabale University | |
dc.subject | Deep Learning | |
dc.subject | Techniques | |
dc.subject | Models | |
dc.subject | Sickle Cell Disease | |
dc.subject | Detection | |
dc.title | Comparison of Deep Learning Techniques in Detection of Sickle Cell Disease. | |
dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Mabirizi Vicent-et al.-Research Article-2023.pdf
- Size:
- 682.55 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: